Rapid adoption of electric vehicles could save money and avoid 24,000 deaths over 20 years

by the Electric Vehicle Council and Asthma Australia found vehicle emissions had 21,000 serious health impacts each year in New South Wales alone.The benefits greatly outweigh the costsevaluated the benefits of a transition to electric vehicles by considering public health, household and emissions reductions savings.

Each electric vehicle was considered to have been bought along with a green energy package. The package minimizes emissions and demands on electricity grid capacity, while increasing the benefits for households.The main differences between the scenarios are the rate of electric vehicle uptake and the degree of government intervention.The research found the business-as-usual scenario undermines national efforts to reduce the loss of life and cut emissions.

The accelerated adoption strategy, however, is well aligned with uptake in other nations. Their example shows it can be achieved using progressive policies and incentives. If implemented, the accelerated scenario could reduce the loss of life by around 24,000 by 2042. The reduction in emissions over this time would be 444 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, or 9 percent of

. The cost would be around 118 billion Australian dollars, less than half of the total benefits of 266 billion Australian dollars.

No it couldn't. Because we can't even sustain our electric grid AS IS. Why do we have states already telling people they are going to have to budget their electric depending on the time of day? And we think this will get better? Worst fucking idea of all time.

I still think the early adopters will be commercial trucking companies that have well defined routes and schedules which can be adjusted to avoid high traffic volumes.

Singapore Singapore Latest News, Singapore Singapore Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Banning Gas Cars Is Good, but It’ll Take More to Save the PlanetPeople must both drive less and switch to electric vehicles to reduce carbon emissions enough to avoid the worst effects of climate change. Taller buildings. Density. Stop bullshitting. Are you climate activists to perseve nature or climate activists to have cheap energy that's clean? You can have a single family ranch houses 10 miles from work. 'won't be enough'? How about 'won't do anything, at all, except make obscene amounts of money for the climate change grifters' U.S. needs a rapid recharging station infrastructure 🤷‍♂️
Source: WIREDBusiness - 🏆 68. / 68 Read more »

Lincoln Has No Plan To Buyout Dealers Not Wanting To Make EV Switch | CarscoopsLincoln Has No Plan To Buyout Dealers Not Wanting To Make EV Switch | Carscoops carscoops
Source: Carscoop - 🏆 306. / 63 Read more »

Are you ready to switch to an EV? Here's why you may find yourself priced out of the marketThis year likely will be the first that electric-vehicle battery costs will go up, rather than continuing the steady downward trend they've been on for more... “Isn’t this great, slaves?” Yeah I can't wait to wait almost an hour to charge my vehicle so I can only drive it within my province and hopefully not have to replace my $25,000 battery. I also hope my prime minister doesn't shut off my car or drive me off the road for donating to a freedom convoy. I'm definitely ready to sit at home on my ass
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Uber now offers EV rides in 25 cities | EngadgetUber has expanded its Comfort Electric service 'nationwide' to 24 US cities, letting users request rides in all-electric vehicles.. nice timing on the uber article, make use of all of the searches right now for 'uber'.
Source: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 Read more »