Govt’s electric car claim ‘doesn’t reflect’ reality | Sky News Australia

  • 📰 SkyNewsAust
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 21 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 78%

Energy Energy Headlines News

Energy Energy Latest News,Energy Energy Headlines

.EVCouncil's BJafari has dismissed the Coalition’s claim that AustralianLabor is planning to create a new tax to make homes and apartments electric vehicle charger-ready LiveNow auspol

CEO of the Electric Vehicle Council Behyad Jafari has dismissed the Coalition’s claim that Labor is planning to create a new tax to make homes and apartments electric vehicle charger-ready.

As part of its policy for all new car sales to be electric by 2030, Labor is planning to work with state and local governments to develop electric vehicle charging stations in new residential buildings if elected next month. Energy Minister Angus Taylor has slammed the initiative, claiming government modeling shows it could cost ‘billions’ for new residential properties to install the technology.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

EVCouncil AustralianLabor Heads up the copy currently reads 'for all new car sales to be electric by 2030'. While that sounds good to me, the ALP policy is for 50%.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 7. in ENERGY

Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Di Natale slams climate change costings as 'garbage' | Sky News AustraliaGreens leader Richard Di Natale has slammed climate change cost modelling by economist Brian Fisher as ‘garbage’. \n\nMr Fisher has estimated Labor’s plan to reduce carbon emissions by 45 per cent by 2030, would wipe $542 billion from the Australian economy. \n\nMr Di Natale has told Sky News the modelling should be disregarded because it doesn’t consider the cost of climate change ‘inaction’. \n\nThe Greens leader says he had no doubt ‘the cost of inaction will dwarf the cost of action’. \n\n\n\n\n So he didnt actually dispute the cost... And he would know about garbage. The Greens have been peddling it for decades. auspol ausvotes greensbelonginsaladnotsenates So Richard produced his own modelling? Didn't think so.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »