Analysis | The Energy 202: Democrats try to reset climate debate after Green New Deal defeat

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 31 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 72%

Energy Energy Headlines News

Energy Energy Latest News,Energy Energy Headlines

Analysis: Democrats try to reset climate debate after Green New Deal defeat

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York speaks to members of the media following a Senate policy luncheon on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. in the Senate, Democrats tried to prove they would not give up on tackling climate change — an issue that has energized their base and that they think is a political winner for them.

Schatz acknowledged the move was unusual for a party in the minority, but insisted these are “unusual times” given “the total unwillingness of Senate Republicans to take this issue seriously.” And Senate Republicans had earlier this week blocked a resolution from Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer on Tuesday to formally create a bipartisan climate panel, arguing that there are committees in Congress to address environmental issues such as climate change.

Schumer hoped to include climate-related measures within other bills, including for infrastructure, taxes and the federal budget.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Quit letting the Republicans take Ideas, since they have none, and trying to smear the Democrats as if it’s policy. Threats and Attacks are childish. Let the childish President and GOP play their childish games. This to shall pass!

The left keeps looking wackier and wackier

Come on, Washington Post. Really, one defeat which was a set up anyway and you want to make it look huge? Maybe some of the criticism the media has been receiving has been earned. Perhaps, some time for reflection within your org. is needed.

What debate? They put out talking points and refuse to talk about them, just screeching about what a crisis it is, one so big they don’t want to propose any real solutions.

Reveal to the American TAXPAYER just how much GRANT MONEY these 'scientists' receive yearly for their promotion of 'Global Warming.' Some are of the same group who yelled 'The Coming ICE AGE' back in the 1970s. Global Warming is a HOAX based on MONEY.

Step one. Mischaracterize a foregone vote. Step two. Call it a defeat instead of a stunt. Step three. Disseminate the modified narrative.

These fools are not interested in the environment or climate change - they're only interested in taking control of the country, and taking power away from the people. These are the new nazi's.

Imagine how much carbon we could save if Democrats practiced what they screeched. GreenNewDeal ClimateChange

The democrats in GOD BLESS AMERICA can try everything....i was just in here and must spoke out again....GODKING....without pain....YOU SEE THE DEVIL JUST HERE INSIDE OR JUST YOUR HOLY SOULY....IF I RULE....OVERFLYS AMPERE AND JULE....WHO I AM IN DARK?NESSI? HERE? I AM GODKING

WTF? It wasn’t even a serious vote. Does Mitch McConnell write your headlines for you?

You’re not going to stop climate change by limiting manmade carbon. If you want to talk about a carbon tax as a means of balancing the budget we can talk about that. But the Green New Deal is the product of a developmentally disabled person. That’s as kindly as it can be stated.

Democrats need to worry about why their party attempted to overthrow a president illegally. Not a damn thing other than that should concern these offiicial at this point. Democracy RELIES on Truth - Facts - Partiotism. NOT on Opinion - Lies - Sedition

Ban more cows

Translation: Some of our colleagues are certifiably insane, but we’d really like to discuss this.

Fiasco is a better word

A great climate bill can only be accomplished if you leave the DEMONcrats out of it.

And if this was a republican defeat I’m sure you would carry such a milquetoast headline. Sorry WP your propaganda is showing

NOT on Flemish TV vrtnws vrtnws VTMNIEUWS vtmnieuws in Belgium. But bashing Trump was a full time job, 24/7/365, even now. ArnoutGoemans

Who the fuck is defeated? Everyone knew it wouldn’t pass the Senate because there’s too many Republicans. Shit, there’s too many centrist Democrats in there too. The work continues, there’s no “defeat” of any meaning here.

Yeah we now only have 11 years and 364 days left before Extinction

There was no Green New Deal defeat. There was a Republican effort to define the Green New Deal that Democrats refused to vote on.

Let’s be honest, this is what all this is REALLY about.

yeah still making moves and seizing the economy, good luck chuck up going to go downin flames over it.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in ENERGY

Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Analysis | The Energy 202: Senate Democrats look for unity on eve of Green New Deal voteThe Energy 202: Senate Democrats look for unity on eve of Green New Deal vote Kudos for strategic response to ActingKingOfTheSenate Mitch McConnell. GreenNewDeal, MedicareForAll and HonestCapitalismNotSocialism need Democratic definition to stop Republican efforts to define by bad analogy. PURE CAPITALISM? $$$ to buy biggest army to crush competition. Unity in Insanity. By golly sounds like the New Democratic Socialist Party.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Analysis | The Energy 202: Rick Perry calls expanding nuclear energy “the real” Green New DealThe financial boost comes amid debate in Washington over what to do about climate change. Sure. Just let them blow up and destroy everything within 50 miles radius! Good idea, NOT! I'm going to pretend that he's not really the Energy Secretary because remember how in the 2012 Presidential race, he wanted to abolish the Energy Department. Oh, that's right, he forgot during the debate, so never mind.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

After Green New Deal goes down, Democrats try less ambitious approach to climate changeAfter seeing the Senate defeat the Green New Deal, House Democrats float a more modest approach to combating climate change: revive the Paris accord. But we're all gonna die in 12 years, those little crying propaganda kids said so Present. the president is working for the citizens of Pittsburgh not the citizens of Paris, madam Speaker... moretoknow
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Analysis | The Energy 202: 'Let a thousand climate proposals bloom.' Lawmakers tee up Green New Deal alternativesAfter the Senate votes today, there will likely be an opening for other proposals to gain traction in the national discussion. Opinion That’s right get on the raw green deal bandwagon, they see profits and the path to getting richer on the backs of working schlubs who will be forced to pay and pay and pay through the nose
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Analysis | The Energy 202: 'A political game.' 2020 Democrats explain why they didn't vote for Green New DealAnalysis: 'A political game.' 2020 Democrats explain why they didn't vote for Green New Deal They're too alt-right. Because it's a disaster for Americans Because who ever came up with it must be out of there mind
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Marco Rubio: Green New Deal litmus test makes it harder to deal with climate changeFrom usatodayopinion: 'The Green New Deal might have been a successful publicity stunt, but it is a fundamentally unserious choice,' writes Sen. Marco Rubio. usatodayopinion Marco who? usatodayopinion Meh, don't know for certain some places may adopt it. usatodayopinion Does he still take NRA money?
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »