Electric cars are good fun for wealthy virtue signallers, but a dreadful way to save the planet

  • 📰 The Telegraph
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States United States Headlines News

United States United States Latest News,United States United States Headlines

'If Johnson bans new petrol cars by then, he would essentially forbid 87 per cent of consumers from buying the cars they want'

In a move to burnish Britain’s green credentials, Boris Johnson is to announce a ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars from 2030. He is following other political leaders, including Joe Biden, in promising lavish carrots to energise the market for electric cars along with sticks to outlaw petrol cars. Unfortunately, electric cars will achieve only tiny emissions savings at a very high price.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Whose running the country?

You could convert the gas guzzlers to electric. Then you get what you want. Wait, you mean what you want is noisy smelly fossil fuel?

What’s the Telegraphs’ point? Is Johnson being too woke?

Paywall

Sounds good! And demand would then be for cars that pollute much less. Sounds like a win to me

but the polar bears horse and cart

First was petrol , then they convinced everyone to move to diesel because petrol was bad .... no diesel is bad and everyone must move to electric ..... they are simply playing games based on how much they make .

The planet don't need to be saved,but only ourselves.

And the queues at service stations? Since a normal stop would be 15mins, then it would be plus45

Well in 2030 electric cars will be affordable to those who buy brand new cars. To those that buy second user cars petrol and diesel will be available, people are making out that only electric cars will be allowed to be driven ban

Should work out fine.😱

Ban petrol and desiel, then make electric cars unaffordable for the majority. The aim is for everyone to own little or nothing! The young can't afford a car or a home already that's not going to change. Next is to hit the middle classes for the want of a better label.

Thats what they want ! survival of the fittest/richest

Can't even write two paragraphs without resorting to 'virtue signalling'. Nothing to see here.

I like the presumption that Boris will still be our PM at that time.

Again with Mandates! What kind of 'free' society mandates everything? Oh, that's right...a FEUDAL one! Add a gas tax if you want but stop trying to Think For Consumers! Bloody hell..

If the planet needed saving it would wipe us out. Just like the dinosaurs

ffs😂he has zero power to ban anything, this isn’t NK yet, take your 💩💩💩elsewhere👍

Johnson knowingly is basing every decision on misrepresented and fraudulent data to usher in the UN’s Agenda 2030. Johnson isn’t a Tory, he’s far from it.

And they are more harmful in there production

It’s strange as to why much cleaner LPG fuel isn’t being mandated for use for internal combustion engines rather than electric cars. Existing infrastructure can be mostly used for LPG, whereas millions of homes and flats can’t support electric car charging, let alone the Grid.

If you have everything,but no time you have nothing.If you have nothing,but you have time,you have everything👍🏻

It will save thousands of lives with less pollution in the air. I can't really see a downside

In 10 years time when it’s likely that there won’t be all that many purely ICE cars available anyway

Don’t expect people to rush out and buy them either

Or can afford...

Its extended lockdown in another form

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 41. in US

United States United States Latest News, United States United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Electric cars are not perfect, but they are a good start | LettersLetters: The use of lithium in rechargeable vehicle batteries is problematic but this shouldn’t derail attempts to decarbonise our environment, writes Jamie Adam, while Jim Grozier believes we need infrastructure that discourages car use I love the smell of diesel How are we going to dispose of the toxic waste once the batteries are no good? They don't last forever.... In the rush of the trending topic (in this case EV), we will create a new industry that will reproduce exactly the same mistakes than the previous one. We should 'de-mediatize' this topic and open a calm debate about how we want to be mobile in the future, all over the world.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »