such as civil unrest and state failure. Slowing population growth will reduce pressures on all of these issues and threats.
Population growth is a fraught issue. In the last few decades, a major driver to limit family size has been the demographic shift towards urban areas. In cities, additional kids become a liability because of the higher costs of housing and food. This shows that people can change attitudes towards family size quite rapidly, given incentives and access to family planning.
There are many reasons for not adding the next 2 billion to global population, but the absolute exigency of lowering global GHG emissions should be sufficient to return population pressures to the international agenda. More to the point, if humanity does not voluntarily control our numbers, climate change and its four horsemen of heat, floods, droughts, and storms, will do it for us.
Yeah,nobody talks about that. Door's open now so here it goes. 8 billion people eat, drink and shit at least once a day, that is a seaful of freshwater down the drain on a daily basis. But who's willing to die for the rest of us? Any takers? I know I don't.
Genocide advocates at time magazine
So who shall we kill?
The writer blatantly lies from the first paragraph. Attached UN population projections in 1990
That’s why climate solutions need to be implemented and develop symmetrical/ parallel to growth. DOGE
Time for genocide to help the earth
So who will stop having babies?
I suppose all the people that think we're overpopulated and fear the change in climate from that could decide to leave this earth.