Nuclear not the solution Australia needs, says electricity grid chief

  • 📰 theage
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 48 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 77%

대한민국 헤드 라인 뉴스

대한민국 최근 뉴스,대한민국 헤드 라인

One of Australia’s top energy officials warns nuclear energy is expensive and cannot be developed in time to replace coal plants.

Australia’s energy market operator has dismissed claims that nuclear is the answer to the power grid’s challenges, warning the technology is expensive and cannot be developed in time to replace rapidly retiring coal-fired generators.

“Even on the most optimistic outlook, nuclear power won’t be ready in time for the exit of Australia’s coal-fired power stations,” Westerman said. “And the imperative to replace that retiring generation is with us now.” AEMO, which oversees the interstate power and gas markets, assumes that number could be even higher. Its 25-year road map, released last month following consultations with 2100 stakeholders, found that 90 per cent of the remaining coal capacity was likely to have shut by 2035, and expects the fossil fuel to have exited the grid entirely by 2040.

That report concluded that Australia’s first nuclear plant would cost up to $16 billion, and could not be operational until at least 2040, despite the Coalition promising it would be ready in the 2030s. Opposition energy spokesman Ted O’Brien said the Coalition believed in a “balanced mix of technologies”, including renewables, gas and nuclear energy, to replace coal.

 

귀하의 의견에 감사드립니다. 귀하의 의견은 검토 후 게시됩니다.
이 소식을 빠르게 읽을 수 있도록 요약했습니다. 뉴스에 관심이 있으시면 여기에서 전문을 읽으실 수 있습니다. 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오:

 /  🏆 8. in KR

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

Nuclear energy: Peter Dutton pledges 7 government-owned nuclear power stations by 2050Peter Dutton has pulled the trigger on the nuclear power plan the opposition will take to the next federal election, under which the first unit would be operational in a just over a decade,
출처: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Peter Dutton nuclear plan: Locals might prefer nuclear to renewable poles and wiresPeter Dutton’s nuclear energy plan could win support from communities concerned about major infrastructure upgrades needed to get solar and wind power into the grid.
출처: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

What we know about Australia's only live nuclear reactorAustralia's only nuclear reactor opened more than 60 years ago. With nuclear energy production banned, what is it used for?
출처: SBSNews - 🏆 3. / 89 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

The Coalition's nuclear power plan misses one key component: the costThe Coalition has put its cards on the table, unveiling its plan to build nuclear plants to secure Australia's energy future. But one thing was missing — what will it cost?
출처: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »