Nuclear debate is getting heated, but whose energy plan stacks up?

The Coalition’s nuclear power policy is less than a week old but the political debate about Australia’s energy future has been raging since. Some of the claims pushed by the opposition about both its policy and the renewables-focused government plan have prompted plenty of questions about their veracity.Labor’s ‘renewables-only’ plan will cost more than $1 trillion: False

The Australian Energy Market Operator forecasts that the cost of reaching 82 per cent renewables, again largely driven by private investment in wind and solar farms and transmission lines, will cost $121 billion in today’s money.The Albanese government has also committed $20 billion to underwrite transmission-line construction. It has also set up a fund, called the Capacity Investment Scheme, estimated to be worth tens of billions of dollars.

The AEMO releases a document each year called the Integrated System Plan, after consultation with private industry, that details a roadmap of what the most efficient energy system will look like in coming years out to 2050, including new infrastructure. Its nuclear energy policy document, released last week, states that depending on what technology it chooses to prioritise, a large-scale reactor would start generating electricity by 2037 and a small modular reactor by 2035. SMRs are a developing design not yet in commercial production.

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

Barriers, hurdles and roadblocks litter the long road to the Coalition's nuclear futureProject management, legal and energy experts have raised serious doubts about the Coalitions ability to construct nuclear power plants in Australia before 2037.
출처: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Peter Dutton nuclear plan: Locals might prefer nuclear to renewable poles and wiresPeter Dutton’s nuclear energy plan could win support from communities concerned about major infrastructure upgrades needed to get solar and wind power into the grid.
출처: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Nuclear energy: The flaws in CSIRO’s anti-nuclear, pro-renewables GenCost reportThe CSIRO must give a better “apples with apples” comparison of nuclear and renewables to inform the energy transition debate.
출처: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Nuclear energy: Peter Dutton pledges 7 government-owned nuclear power stations by 2050Peter Dutton has pulled the trigger on the nuclear power plan the opposition will take to the next federal election, under which the first unit would be operational in a just over a decade,
출처: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »