Yes, nuclear’s an option. But let there be no confusion about its flaws

The political debate about the role of nuclear power in Australia is so robust it’s a shame we can’t harness its energy. Given there is an election in the wind, it would be unfortunate if this vital conversation about our country’s sustainable energy future became bogged down in political point-scoring.

The mining resources required for construction are low: no battery materials such as lithium and cobalt, or rare-earth elements such as neodymium and terbium, are needed.The land footprint is only about three square kilometres for a one-gigawatt nuclear plant versus about 60 square kilometres for a.

Hinkley Point C is the only nuclear power plant under construction in the UK. The latest construction cost estimate is a stunningly highand if it meets its expected completion date of 2031, that will be 23 years since the initial approval by the UK government.Despite the challenges, it is worth considering nuclear power as a long-term option in Australia for two reasons.

대한민국 최근 뉴스, 대한민국 헤드 라인

Similar News:다른 뉴스 소스에서 수집한 이와 유사한 뉴스 기사를 읽을 수도 있습니다.

Nuclear power: Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan goes nuclear on Peter Dutton’s energy policiesJacinta Allan says Coalition nuclear energy supporters have spent too much time watching The Simpsons.
출처: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »

Nuclear energy: Western nations ‘too optimistic’ on nuclear, warns engineering chiefThe chief executive of Atkins Realis says more planning is needed to stop cost blowouts and delays, ahead of the first global nuclear energy summit.
출처: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 더 많은 것을 읽으십시오 »