Climate law experts are already calling it one of the most impactful rulings on human rights and climate change ever made. Today’s judgment, from the European Court of Human Rights , was read out in front of an eclectic gathering of concerned plaintiffs from around the continent.
In this case, the court did not accept complaints from individuals within the group, but it did accept complaints made by the group itself as an organization—a distinction that could influence how people collectivize and approach European courts with similar cases in the future, says Heri. She adds that there was a possibility the court could have ruled that the European Convention on Human Rights doesn’t actually require climate action.
Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
International Court Rules Country Violated Human Rights by Not Protecting People from Climate ChangeThe European Court of Human Rights has ruled that a country violated human rights by not protecting its citizens from the effects of climate change. The court's decision came after a Swiss association filed a complaint, stating that the government failed to protect older women during heatwaves. The court stated that individuals have the right to effective protection from the adverse effects of climate change on their lives and well-being.
Sumber: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 Baca lebih lajut »
European nations must protect citizens from climate change impacts, EU human rights court rulesEurope's top human rights court rules EU nations must protect citizens from climate change, as campaigners take heart from mixed decisions.
Sumber: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Baca lebih lajut »
European court rules Switzerland climate inaction violated human rightsThe European Court of Human Rights ruled that Switzerland violated some rights by failing to slow effects of climate change, although it tossed out two other cases.
Sumber: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Baca lebih lajut »