‘Inadvertent geoengineering’: Researchers say low-sulfur shipping rules made climate change worse

Described at the time as the "biggest change in oil market history," the International Maritime Organization enforced new standards on Jan. 1, 2020, to cut their fuel sulfur content to 0.5%, down from 3.5%.

Countries at the meeting of the United Nations' International Maritime Organization in London signed a deal for shipping emissions to reach net zero "by or around" 2050.A sweeping regulatory change in 2020 to slash air pollution from the world's ships could have played a role in boosting global average temperatures, according to the findings of a controversial study.," the International Maritime Organization enforced new standards on Jan.

Describing this as accidental geoengineering, and presenting figures which may overestimate the impacts, could lead to misguided assumptions about policies intended to curb future emissions.

However, Hirschi said the authors likely overestimated the impact the reduction of sulfur in ship fuel had on the record-breaking global temperatures witnessed last year and in 2024.

Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Researchers develop new method to assess equity implications of carbon taxesResearchers from the University of Massachusetts Amherst and Smith College have developed a new method to assess the equity implications of carbon taxes, which are among economists' favored solutions to address the looming threat of climate change.
Source: physorg_com - 🏆 388. / 55 Read more »