It says policymakers should look at the full range of human activities that link to increased emissions.
"The most affluent countries are mainly responsible for the historical emissions and generally have the greatest per capita emissions. Australia's commitment to cut emissions by 26-28 per cent from 2005 levels by 2030 was among those judged to be only partially sufficient.
Yeah. Scientists? Right? Mickey Mouse is one of them. So it’s just a list of names. Not Scientists. How about investigate how many are real ‘scientists.’
Dr Willie Soon demolishes extreme weather panic and other hysterical arguments abcnews smh MomentsAU australian SkyNewsAust SBSNews couriermail Independent canberratimes 2GB873 10NewsFirstQLD canberratimes TheTodayShow ScottMorrisonMP
Throwing coal around in parliament offsets this
Yet they still can’t get the real world data to line up with the computer models 🤷♂️
4 decades. So compelling.
The profession of “scientist” doesn’t mean much to some. There’s always going to be what if’s, and’s and but’s, as if scientists don’t know how to account for relevant variables, just so their denial can still work
Wow 40 years compared to 4.5 billion, and these scientists are basing their conclusions on that?
So fkn what?
The Photo is AMAZING to look at BUT THIS THE BRAVE AND THE REAL EVENT THAT OR BEST R WANTING TO CONTAIN. PUTTING EVERY OUNCE OF STRENGTH TO TAME THIS WILD RAGE: BEFORE MORE LOSS OUR HERO's STAY SAFE YOU MEAN MORE TOO US🌹🌹🇦🇺. Where R th Picket Protesters NOW⁉️‼️❓
looolz
Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SBSNews - 🏆 3. / 89 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »