, since the number density is the number of particles divided by volume, and the energy of each individual photon stretches as the Universe expands, adding an additional factor of 1/and dark energy is a property of space itself, so its energy density remains constant , irrespective of the Universe's expansion or volume.
We already entered this final era billions of years ago. Most of the important events that will define our Universe's history have already occurred. It expanded a small, causally connected patch of the Universe to one much larger than our presently visible Universe: larger than the current causal horizon.
At the high temperatures achieved in the very young Universe, not only can particles and photons be spontaneously created, given enough energy, but also antiparticles and unstable particles as well, resulting in a primordial particle-and-antiparticle soup. Yet even with these conditions, only a few specific states, or particles, can emerge.. Once the expanding Universe is filled with matter, antimatter and radiation, it's going to cool.
Schematic diagram of the Universe's history, highlighting reionization. Before stars or galaxies formed, the Universe was full of light-blocking, neutral atoms. While most of the Universe doesn't become reionized until 550 million years afterwards, with some regions achieving full reionization earlier and others later.
Where does it say that in the Bible?🤷🏼♀️
Nigggga what? 💀 How much you wanna bet?
End is near 🙏😇 that I know
I’m not sure I am interested in reading such a profoundly titled article from a fin-publisher.
How many assumptions are made to create this model ? What if any of the assumptions are wrong ? Shouldn’t the creators of this model give a footnote on such assumptions ?
Thanks for sharing.
You have absolutely no way of knowing whether that’s true & no means of proving it. That is an absurd claim. At least write “OPINION,” so people know it’s not based in fact.
Wrong
It's time to repent and be saved by Our Lord Jesus Christ before d Rapture, d End is here as scientifically confirmed....
Is this part of climate change? Asking for myself.
Doubt.
Pretty misleading title. Or maybe that’s just the way I see it. Made me think the universe was going to “end”, but it’s pretty much the contrary. We’re just forever alone due to the never-ending expansion.
So does it mean we all gonna die after it finishes?
'mass can easily be converted to energy via E = mc2' -- SWAB No! You cannot convert energy into mass. You cannot convert mass into energy. They are NOT flip sides of the same coin. They are NOT equivalent.
No big bang...
Wrong again. I already explained why this is not true. Want to debate it? Post it here.
People in the future are probably going to look back on these models like we do today with early world maps
fakenews & fakescience
i hope i die before the ending