for"green products," lacked real details. And the moderators did not press for details.
Concerning the future of power generation and fuel in America, candidates should be pressed to detail specifics. After all, the last couple of presidents have shown that executive power is exceedingly influential in determining US energy policy. In the recent past, the US has backed loans and made grants for alternative energy research, only to see the participating companies fail. Solyndra and Fisker are two prime examples. Do you support direct government support to alternative energy companies? If so, how would you improve the plan to avoid such huge failures? If not, how would you promote alternative energy?
Their talking points on their issues are shallow at best. All they know is anti trump blah blah. Try to go any deeper and they have no plans other than opposing trump. I remember Obama having all these plans but never really offered up details of his plans-results? Nope!