Liam Fox accused of 'legitimising' climate change denial

  • 📰 The Independent
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 59%

Energy Energy Headlines News

Energy Energy Latest News,Energy Energy Headlines

Cabinet minister later clarified remarks after coming under fire for suggesting the science was up for debate

Shadow international trade secretary Barry Gardiner said his comments were"not acceptable behaviour from a cabinet minister".

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

You're not allowed to have a different opinion from the prescribed mainstream version.

Would that be the same Liam Fox who thinks BREXIT is a good idea and has loads of trade deals lined up?

He thinks it's about selling guns illegally- and he is an expert.

An odious weasel of the highest order...

What does he know maybe more champagne in a commons bar with Tory mates

Why was it warmer before 1940, when we were producing far less CO2 and then the temperature kept decreasing until 1975?

But we all know he is staggeringly incompetent.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 80. in ENERGY

Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Liam Fox accused of legitimising climate change denial - live newsBoris Johnson paid £123,000 for delivering three-hour speech in Delhi, register reveals - live news Ummmm how much did the dup pay 'im Poor bastards, having to listen to that human meringue for three hours.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »

Liam Fox forced to clarify climate change commentsInternational trade secretary appeared to suggest scientific consensus could be questioned 'Finite resources'!! GAHH!!! Liam put the glass pipe down !! YQG Of course scientific consensus can be challenged. Just not very effectively by non-evidence based blather. That’s the Lord Lawson/Christopher Booker approach. The “it snowed today, so much for climate change” and “that shrinking iceberg is just getting bigger in other ways” fools
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »