Monster energy drink maker expands lawsuit against rival Bang

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 78 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 34%
  • Publisher: 82%

Energy Energy Headlines News

Energy Energy Latest News,Energy Energy Headlines

Monster energy drink's maker says fast-growing rival Bang is engaging in false advertising and unfair competition, among other claims.

The parent of Monster Energy drinks is suing the maker of rival Bang drinks for alleged false advertising and unfair competition. is fighting back in court by alleging that Bang’s producer engages in false advertising and other business malfeasance.

In its latest suit, Monster alleged that “Bang’s main pitch to consumers” — the drink’s “super creatine” compound — “is a hoax,” and that Vital also has interfered with distribution contracts to gain in-store shelf space at Monster’s expense. “Monster is simply living up to its reputation of being an overly litigious ‘bully’ and employing scorched-earth tactics to deal with perceived competitors,” privately held Vital said, adding that it “will address Monster’s sham complaint in due course” and was confident it would be dismissed.

Protecting market share is crucial today because the sales growth of the overall energy drink sector has slowed from a decade ago, when the drinks exploded in popularity.In the 12 months that ended in mid-March, U.S. retail sales of the drinks — often sold in convenience stores and bought by young adults — totaled $14 billion, up nearly 10% from a year earlier, according to Beverage Digest.

One Vital product, for instance, is Bang Pre-Workout Master Blaster. It’s caffeine-free but includes such ingredients as Vital’s super creatine supplement.The advertising on Bang’s website notes that its statements about its ingredients “have not been evaluated” by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and that the product “is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.”

The suit also alleged that Vital interfered with sales and contractual rights “by rewarding employees and distributors for stealing valuable in-store shelf space” that belonged to Monster.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

BANGenergy sponsor me!!

Bang is way better

This is lawyer speak for “They’re winning”

It’s what’s inside the can that counts.

This will lead to the Monster Vs Bang Supreme Court decision that will reshape the American jurisprudence

Bang just a better product acceptit

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in ENERGY

Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Exclusive: Chinese EV car maker NIO restricts its IPO banks from working for rivals - sourcesChinese electric vehicle (EV) maker NIO Inc has blocked the eight top investment...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »