Top accounting body will not add to climate change rules overload

  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 38 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 97%

Energy Energy Headlines News

Energy Energy Latest News,Energy Energy Headlines

Rules to determine which companies investors can put their money into without fe...

FILE PHOTO: General view of the Walney Extension offshore wind farm operated by Orsted off the coast of Blackpool, Britain September 5, 2018. REUTERS/Phil Noble/File Photo

In the first indication of the role the International Accounting Standards Board sees for itself in policing the reporting of sustainability by companies, its chair Hans Hoogervorst signaled little appetite for mandatory rules. Hoogervorst, a former Dutch finance minister and a convert from scepticism over global warming, said the best way to make companies change was by having standards that focus on the impact of sustainability issues on future profit, which was not happening with the existing plethora of rules.

“Yet another agency puts it somewhere in the middle. People may be forgiven for not making head or tail of it. Moreover, with so many standards, the potential for disclosure overload is enormous,” he added.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Gee aren't these wind turbines ugly on the landscape.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 2. in ENERGY

Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Analysis | The Energy 202: EPA's own adviser finds Trump's rollback of car rules could cost jobsIt will fuel critics of Trump's attempts to reverse Obama-era fuel-efficiency standards. The oil companies are tired of winning. But it’s worth sacrificing jobs if it means we can add more pollution to the air. I’m sure no one would say it would help. He could cure cancer and it would still be wrong
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »