Biden wants 100% clean energy by 2035. It won’t work

  • 📰 dcexaminer
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 73 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 32%
  • Publisher: 94%

Energy Energy Headlines News

Energy Energy Latest News,Energy Energy Headlines

President Joe Biden and congressional Democrats have made historic (i.e. expensive) taxpayer investments in green energy. His administration has paired these expenditures with ill-conceived regulatory proposals to electrify Americans’ cars, green appliances, and much more.

70,000 megawatts of solar photovoltaics and 141,000 MW of on-land wind . By contrast, the Department of Energy hopes by 2035 to amass 900,000 MW of solar photovoltaics and 500,000 MW of on-land wind generation. This would constitute 13-fold and 3.5-fold increases in solar and wind, respectively, in just more than a decade.

Once generated, green electricity requires transmission lines to reach consumers. A glaring problem is that America lacks too many of these transmission lines. Thethat, “Already, a lack of transmission capacity means that thousands of proposed wind and solar projects are facing multiyear delays and rising costs to connect to the grid.

The only way Washington can further this breakneck and seismic shift is with something else that’s green: Taxpayer dollars. Therein lies the economic incongruity of the environmentalist position. Clean-energy facilities, i.e., wind and solar, can function as reliably and cheaply as fossil fuels, environmentalists say, but only a pirate’s ship of taxpayer-funded subsidies can induce industry and consumers to adopt them.

This contradiction resolves itself immediately when one realizes the truth that clean energy often can’t compete without subsidization in a free market. “Since sunlight and wind are, by definition, impossible to dispatch at will, the obvious critical issue is in how to fill gaps of unavailability,” the Manhattan Institute’s Mark MillsCongress. “There are only two ways to do so: Maintain or build additional conventional, dispatchable back-up capacity, or build lots of electricity storage.

Both strategies cost far too much, Mills explained. Obtaining the material components of batteries presents further substantial barriers. And the proof is in the

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in ENERGY

Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines