‘Coal is good’ for ‘energy security’: Mark Latham

  • 📰 SkyNewsAust
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 78%

Energy Energy Headlines News

Energy Energy Latest News,Energy Energy Headlines

NSW One Nation Leader Mark Latham says “coal is good” for “energy security”.

“If we had coal-fired power going forward we wouldn’t have these projections of 50 per cent increase in electricity prices,” Mr Latham said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Yep

Thank you Mark Latham you should be Prime Minister

A no brainer. Pregnancy is good for motherhood.

Sky Notnews quoting another RWNJ. TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.

Yes 👍👍👍

Sky 'news'

Remember Morrison tried the ‘coal is good’ lie and he got a kicked in his pooey pants.

Why are we getting all this crap from this loser. He is a has been and had gone over to the dark side of politics to try to stay relevant.

What we think of and the people they ask for opinions MurdochRoyalCommission Murdoch_RC

He’ll do anything and say anything as long as you pay him.

Coal is best f&k the rest

Crazy people think they can live without it... Germany is paying the price. Just because you dig or drill in someone else's country doesn't make your country green! Normally it's worse.

Bahahahaha. Of course you numpties believe every word of this shill

Just come from the Pub and left with a brown paper bag. Catch up with Matt was it?

It is.

Latham would be advocating in favour of asbestos if someone paid him 🙄

Asbestos is a great heat resistant material, so we should go back to using it, bugger the health consequences.

We need to bring back coal power.

Yeah not so much...

Your digghing up what Earth buried a long time ago. Whos killing what? hey!.

Good old Biff. Gotta keep those mining industry $ coming.

Thanks Mark Latham, another breath of fresh air in the current 'climate' of hot-air windbags destroying our economy, industries and therefore...JOBS

coal is $400/ton is the most expensive for power Renewable is cheaper

Yes, keep posting stuff like this. A certain ex pm did it, and it worked out so well for him.

Nothing wrong with coal ,always gave us plenty of cheap energy

Lath is the man,no bs,no lies...

Nuclear Power is the answer

As new contracts come in north of 80 bucks a ton, its going to be bloody pricey. Unless you want communism Mark.

Quoting leaders in science is really your strength on climate change isn't it

Mark Latham, most well-known for giving the Greens one of their bigger jumps in 1PP votes that the ALP has never really managed to get back.

He's not wrong

Is RealMarkLatham on the coalcaine?

It is just his relevance deficit disorder speaking.

You're supposed to be a news channel, not a comedy site

You irrelevancies join forces.

How about that latham cracked the code bowen can you hear

Better for the environment than solar panels and wind turbines too

The rest of the world says No

It's amazing who can get their thought bubbles online..

Groundbreaking stuff

7 words that indicate why this is most likely bull dust...'NSW One Nation Leader Mark Latham says'

You are correct Mark. If the sun or wind fail we are fcked.

No climate change advocate has yet to tell us the total cost of transitioning to renewables. And I mean total cost - so all the transmission lines, cost to dig up extra resources, everything.

Mark Latham’s 100% right without coal modern country cannot function. You would have to be a real lefty wanker to believe otherwise.

The amount of hot air that comes out of lathams mouth would power a small town.

Mark Latham, that’s some funny shit, he has been discredited his whole worthless political career .. 🤣🤣🤣

JobsenGroth Nuclear is better!

Oh goody another climate denier

RealMarkLatham Who'd have thunked.

Gas is better.

You’re going to really miss that baseload power when labor is done and the jobs it keeps powering as well. ClimateScam wealthtransfer middleclassrobbery

Don’t they use that same stuff overseas to manufacture green energy infrastructure & products? Isn’t that the same as iron ore being shipped using smokey cargo shipping to be smelted into steel then shipped back as product? It makes no sense that those criticise coal energy.

He’s a beneficiary so of course says that.

Mark who?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 7. in ENERGY

Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines