Supreme Court limits EPA in curbing power plant emissions

  • 📰 sfexaminer
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 54 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 63%

Energy Energy Headlines News

Energy Energy Latest News,Energy Energy Headlines

By a 6-3 vote, with conservatives in the majority, the court said that the Clean Air Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants that contribute to global warming.

But Roberts wrote that the Clean Air Act doesn’t give EPA the authority to do so and that Congress must speak clearly on this subject.

Kagan said the stakes in the case are high. She said, “The Court appoints itself—instead of Congress or the expert agency—the decisionmaker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening.” The court held that Congress must speak with specificity when it wants to give an agency authority to regulate on an issue of major national significance.

Those concerns were evident in the court’s orders throwing out two Biden administration policies aimed at reducing the spread of COVID-19. Last summer, the court’s 6-3 conservative majority ended a pause on evictions over unpaid rent. In January, the same six justices blocked a requirement that workers at large employers be vaccinated or test regularly and wear a mask on the job.

With the plan on hold, the legal fight over it continued. But after President Donald Trump took office, the EPA repealed the Obama-era plan. The agency argued that its authority to reduce carbon emissions was limited and it devised a new plan that sharply reduced the federal government’s role in the issue.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 236. in ENERGY

Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court limits EPA in curbing power plant emissionsIn a blow to the fight against climate change, the Supreme Court has limited how the nation’s main anti-air pollution law can be used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Get ready Houston, more cancer clusters coming to your neighborhood. TxDOT’s 45 expansion. More emissions from the south. You thought June was hot?
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court deals Biden climate agenda serious blow with EPA decisionThe Supreme Court ruled in the case of West Virginia v. EPA, a case that had potential major implications for the Biden administration's climate change agenda. Thank God the SCOTUS is striking down Biden’s unconstitutional and radical agenda. Big dubs Excellent
Source: FoxBusiness - 🏆 458. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court limits EPA in curbing power plant emissionsIn a blow to the fight against climate change, the Supreme Court has limited how the nation's main anti-air pollution law can be used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Cue the excitement from the drooling ignorant that think we can pray away the pollution. let me fix this 4U: Supreme Court rules that Congress can’t abdicate it’s responsibility to unelected bureaucrats (as they are wont to do so they can keep getting elected by not getting their hands dirty with difficult and unpopular decisions) Good. This means Congress has to vote and do their jobs. The people win here.
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court limits EPA in curbing power plant emissionsIn a blow to the fight against climate change, the Supreme Court has limited how the nation’s main anti-air pollution law can be used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. By a 6-3 vote Thursday, with conservatives in the majority, the court said that the Clean Air Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants that contribute to global warming. Instead, the EPA is limited to plant-by-plant regulation, the high court said. The court’s ruling could complicate the administration’s plans to combat climate change. Expand the court to reflect the 13 circuit courts. The court has become too radicalized. Making rulings based on religious beliefs not the law. When you grow tired of just fucking over your country, fuck over the world. The Utah Republican Legislature will take great joy in knowing that their efforts to stop the drive towards improving air quality along the Wasatch Front now has the blessing of SCOTUS.
Source: sltrib - 🏆 316. / 61 Read more »

Supreme Court limits EPA power to curb greenhouse gas emissions from power plantsIn a blow to the fight against climate change, the Supreme Court on Thursday limited how the nation’s main anti-air pollution law can be used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. ;) ‘Kagan said the stakes in the case are high. She said, “The Court appoints itself—instead of Congress or the expert agency—the decisionmaker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening.”’ Bye Mother Earth 😢 we’ll miss y… … wait we live here 🤦‍♀️ We’re all dead Jim
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »