in half by the end of the decade and to have an emissions-free power sector by 2035. Power plants account for roughly 30% of carbon dioxide output.
In a dissent, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the decision strips the EPA of the power Congress gave it to respond to “the most pressing environmental challenge of our time.” The power plant case has a long and complicated history that begins with the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan. That plan would have required states to reduce emissions from the generation of electricity, mainly by shifting away from coal-fired plants.
With the plan on hold, the legal fight over it continued. But after President Donald Trump took office, the EPA repealed the Obama-era plan. The agency argued that its authority to reduce carbon emissions was limited and it devised a new plan that sharply reduced the federal government’s role in the issue.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Energy Energy Latest News, Energy Energy Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court limits EPA in curbing power plant emissionsIn a blow to the fight against climate change, the Supreme Court has limited how the nation’s main anti-air pollution law can be used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Get ready Houston, more cancer clusters coming to your neighborhood. TxDOT’s 45 expansion. More emissions from the south. You thought June was hot?
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court deals Biden climate agenda serious blow with EPA decisionThe Supreme Court ruled in the case of West Virginia v. EPA, a case that had potential major implications for the Biden administration's climate change agenda. Thank God the SCOTUS is striking down Biden’s unconstitutional and radical agenda. Big dubs Excellent
Source: FoxBusiness - 🏆 458. / 53 Read more »
Supreme Court limits EPA in curbing power plant emissionsIn a blow to the fight against climate change, the Supreme Court has limited how the nation's main anti-air pollution law can be used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Cue the excitement from the drooling ignorant that think we can pray away the pollution. let me fix this 4U: Supreme Court rules that Congress can’t abdicate it’s responsibility to unelected bureaucrats (as they are wont to do so they can keep getting elected by not getting their hands dirty with difficult and unpopular decisions) Good. This means Congress has to vote and do their jobs. The people win here.
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court curbs EPA's ability to fight climate changeThe Supreme Court curbs the federal government’s ability to fight climate change. The decision is one of the most consequential cases for climate change and clean air in decades. 👏 👏, just what we needed, an official excuse to destroy humanity. giobrunetti Guns before Women and Our Environment protest_nyc XR_NYC
Source: cnni - 🏆 326. / 59 Read more »