Even after these studies were published, the hiatus remained a favored topic among climate skeptics, who used it to argue that concern over global warming was overblown. Congressman Lamar Smith, a Republican from Texas who chaired the House of Representatives’ science committee in the mid-2010s, was particularly incensed by the 2015 NOAA study. He demanded to see the underlying data while also accusing NOAA of altering it.
E. OTWELL; SOURCE: NASA, NOAA, MET OFFICE HADLEY CENTRE. HADCRUT5 DATA WAS SET TO A BASELINE OF 1850–1900. NOAA AND NASA DATA WERE VERTICALLY ALIGNED WITH IT USING A REFERENCE PERIOD OF 1981–2010. Science relies on testing hypotheses and questioning conclusions, but here’s a case where probing an anomaly was taken arguably too far. It caused researchers to doubt their conclusions and spend large amounts of time questioning their well-established methods, says Stephan Lewandowsky, a cognitive scientist at the University of Bristol who has studied climate scientists’ response to the hiatus.
You do realize that the climate has been changing for 4 billion years, right?
Key statement comes at the end: “The warmest seven years on record have all occurred since 2015, and each decade since the 1980s has been warmer than the one before.” ClimateChangeIsReal ClimateCrisis
Hopeless attempt, people are laughing at you Real Climate Change God God in water SCIENCE Japanese - Solar Activity and Cosmic rays Not Carbon Dioxide. Mini Ice Age 2030s
In further news from TASS...
using unproven theory as scientific law has kept scientific and technological growth hampered and safely contained in schroedingers box.
Very important.
Science is always affected by what questions you ask
What climate change!! it's all a hype and part of our natural solar interaction that has been ongoing since the formation of our planet. It's about scientists getting funding for stupid projects that are blinding all to the obvious, no such thing as global warming linked to Co2.
Jesus chased the 'money changers' out of the temple of God. Maybe take a hint and chase the money changers out of the science department? Never happen. If climate change means doomsday is coming and a product of man burning fossil fuels we're doomed.
Along with the 6.9 additional people exhaling 2.5 pounds of CO2 each daily there's their dogs, cats and food animals that have increased proportionally. Are we blaming fossil fuels for CO2 from people and their animals? I think maybe so.
The global population has grown from 1 billion in 1800 to 7.9 billion in 2020. Humans exhale 2.5 pounds of carbon dioxide daily. In 200 years the daily CO2 from people breathing increased by 17,250,000,000 pounds per day, 6,296,250,000,000 pounds annually. Fossil fuels how much?
Real Climate Change SCIENCE Japanese - Solar Activity and Cosmic rays Not Carbon Dioxide. Mini Ice Age 2030s