Normally, if you miss your last chance to do something — catch a flight, see a movie, etc. — you stop trying. If you think climate change should be the moral equivalent of war, then you should manage expectations like a wartime leader does. You don’t say “we’ll lose the war if we lose this one battle” — unless it’s true.You also don’t refuse to use your most effective weapons, at least not in a fight for the survival of humanity, without a good reason.
there’s “no credible path to climate stabilization that does not include a substantial role for nuclear power.”, the climate change activist, the arguments against nuclear power boil down to it being “extremely dangerous, expensive,” and “time-consuming.” Let’s start with dangerous. For reasons of human psychology, deep-seated fear of nuclear power is socially acceptable among those who claim to “follow the science.” But just as the COVID-19 vaccines — despite what anti-vaxxers claim —The 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear accident, the worst in American history,
opinion 💯
opinion Of course this is a Jonah Goldberg op-ed.
iammarkcarnegie opinion He has already
opinion And just how will we get rid of the waste Bad idea. Solar panels on every rooftop, not on the ground.
opinion Exactly. But he won’t because Democrats would rather fear monger the issue than fix it.
opinion What's the end to end cost on a new reactor?